About Me
- Name: Nick W.
- Location: Wisconsin, United States
Libertarian observations from within the Ivory Tower by an archivist, librarian and researcher.
Email me at
libertarian_librarian@hotmail.com
Worth a visit or two
- Andrew Sullivan
- The Ornery American
- Iraq the Model
- Dennis the Peasant
- Tim Blair
- James Lileks
- Views from the other side of the aisle
- Views from the XX side of genetics
Archives
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
A university is just a group of buildings gathered around a library. ~Shelby Foote
Wednesday, March 16, 2005
Oh THAT Ivory Tower
Just wanted to drop in a small chunk from a faculty email during the Churchill vs. Summers discussion we had here at Parkside:
Renault: I am shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[The croupier comes out of the gambling room and up to Renault. He hands him a roll of bills.]
Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
Renault: Oh. Thank you very much.
Nope, no bias here at Parkside.
To this faculty members credit, he did argue strongly that censoring anyone is dangerous, and he did not sign either the Churchill or the Summers letter. So, he's at least consistent. Given the list of folks he wished would shut up, however, it is pretty much impossible to avoid his liberal bias. Which is hard to believe, I know. To quote from Casablanca:All that said, I sure wish some people would just shut the hell up (I won't mention any names Pat Buchanan, Pat Robertson, Margaret Spellings, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh...).
Renault: I am shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[The croupier comes out of the gambling room and up to Renault. He hands him a roll of bills.]
Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
Renault: Oh. Thank you very much.
Nope, no bias here at Parkside.
Labels: Oh That Ivory Tower
Comments:
<< Home
So, is bias inherently bad? Liberal or otherwise? If the faculty member signed neither letter, what is the real issue? Is bias really bad or is it really only bad when someone with an obvious bias masks themselves in objectivity? In this case, then, the faculty member was fairly blatant in his liberal bias. Others can take his opinion at face value and do with it what they wish.
No, bias is not inherently bad-- we all have them, and I appreaciate knowing them ahead of time. There are two major problems with bias in academe these days.
The first is that the bias is far, far too heavily weighted to the left. A hugely disproportionate percentage of faculty and staff are democrats/liberals, and much of that bias is now bleeding into the classroom, thus influencing students. Which would be okay if they received counter influences from the other side of the spectrum. But since there are few conservative voices in today's universities, the faculty's bias serves more as indoctrination than as one perspective on the world.
The second problem is that many faculty don't realize, or don't acknowledge, that they have this bias. This causes them to present their slanted viewpoints as "balanced and fair." Thus, any views that are more conservative than the faculty's come to be seen as far-right or extreme. The whole spectrum of opinion winds up scewed way to the left, so that centrists positions seem radical, and extreme left-wing positions seem run-of-the-mill.
Thanks for the comment!
Post a Comment
The first is that the bias is far, far too heavily weighted to the left. A hugely disproportionate percentage of faculty and staff are democrats/liberals, and much of that bias is now bleeding into the classroom, thus influencing students. Which would be okay if they received counter influences from the other side of the spectrum. But since there are few conservative voices in today's universities, the faculty's bias serves more as indoctrination than as one perspective on the world.
The second problem is that many faculty don't realize, or don't acknowledge, that they have this bias. This causes them to present their slanted viewpoints as "balanced and fair." Thus, any views that are more conservative than the faculty's come to be seen as far-right or extreme. The whole spectrum of opinion winds up scewed way to the left, so that centrists positions seem radical, and extreme left-wing positions seem run-of-the-mill.
Thanks for the comment!
<< Home