A university is just a group of buildings gathered around a library. ~Shelby Foote

Friday, June 16, 2006

Is Nifong’s Blood in the Water?

Is Nifong’s Blood in the Water?

Special Libertarian Librarian Correspondent John Heeder


Durham District Attorney, Mike Nifong, must be wondering if his blood is in the water. His campaign Manager, Jackie Brown, who oversaw Nifong’s primary win last month, has jumped ship on him. In fact, Ms. Brown has set up a mass mailing campaign for potential write-in candidate Lewis Cheek, to get his name on the ballot against Mike Nifong.

His own campaign manager has deserted him, just before the general election. And that’s the tip of the iceberg. His case against the Duke University Lacrosse players is on life support. (If the various players’ defense attorneys are to be believed.) The stripper who claimed rape has been painted as a, well, I just can’t bring myself to use those sort of words. Let’s just call her a lost soul.

Other than her claims, which have been challenged by a fellow stripper, there is no evidence against the Duke students. Any competent prosecutor would have dumped this case months ago. Nifong persists, and his case has steadily deteriorated.

Once again it appears that the case against the Duke students should never have been brought. Nifong’s desire to be re-elected has warped his judgment. It appears that there is no crime, and innocent college students are paying the price for Nifong’s ambitions.

Which brings up the question: what legal recourse do these students have against Nifong? It appears that the inevitable end of all this is going to be legal action against Nifong and the city of Durham.

Labels: ,

“If Mike Nifong doesn't get disbarred after this, then there really is a corrupt system in
Durham that protects rich white guys. In Nifong's case - stupid rich white guys with transparent political agendas.”

I thought the stripper had serious integrity issues, but seems to Nifong have serious integrity issues of his own. Publicly trying to convict and condemn these boys in the media is unethical to say the least, but fabricating a case to convict these boys in court is criminal
I thought the stripper had serious integrity issues, but seems to Nifong have serious integrity issues of his own. Publicly trying to convict and condemn these boys in the media is unethical to say the least, but fabricating a case to convict these boys in court is criminal

Hey Betty! It’s great to have a feminist of your stature posting here! Does being dead get in your way much? :->

Nifong has actually gone quiet lately. He’s not talking. He knows, so to speak, that his nuts are in a vise. As for fabricating the case, that remains to be seen. He isn’t manufacturing evidence, that we know of, so much as he’s apparently ignoring exculpatory evidence.
Well j.j.ice, to answer your question: No it actually frees me to say a lot f things I wouldn't have had I still been living.. hmmm. Go figure.

Nifong has gone quiet, and there's no mystery in why. The evidence (or lack there of) revealed that he was bluffing and lying. A rape never occurred.

He can't manufacture evidence... he tried. He claimed a rape drug could have been used when he possessed the evidence that showed that no toxicity test was ever done. He lied on several occasions and it's all come back to bite him in the ass as he sucked on his own foot. I totally agree with you that he is ignoring any evidence that doesn't support his fantasy of a gang rape, which is all evidence. The DNA evidence is ignored, but the latest evidence is the rape kit exam where only vaginal swelling and a skinned knee and ankle were the only injuries. Nifong claimed the stripper was strangled and severely beaten, yet now the medical exam doesn't support his fantasy.

With only the word of a stripper, with a long criminal history and pattern of making false accusations, as his only evidence that a crime occurred as his only evidence, it's no wonder why Nifong is running away with his tail between his leg. He is an embarrassment to the entire judicial system. He will be disbarred for his irresponsible behavior and professional misconduct.

VOTE FOR County Commissioner Lewis Cheek's for Durham District Attorney
Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Mentioned No Condoms Were Used
It seems the defense keeps finding more to support their side of things, with each new piece of information they get. Now from that stack of 1,300 papers, they have discovered that the stripper accuser mentioned no condoms were used. No condoms and…
The stripper’s body was completely void of any sign of a sexual assault (except for signs of recent vaginal and anal from her boyfriend). The alleged crime scene was completely devoid of DNA.

It is impossible that a crime scene with three drunk men in a small enclosed room with a fighting and clawing woman being orally, virginally, and anally penetrated not leave any DNA evidence of urine, blood, vaginal fluid, sweat, fecal matter, scat smears, saliva, tears, or semen... especially if condoms were used. How would they take off the condoms during all this chaos without spilling, smearing, or touching the content inside or outside of the condom?

When investigators questioned the stripper after DNA tests on the semen found inside her vagina and rectum didn’t match any of the Duke players, the stripper admitted to having had sex with at least three men around the time of the alleged rape. The stripper named her boyfriend and two men who drove her to Duke.

When questioned, the “drivers” said they would drop her off at several places, including hotel rooms.

It appears that the stripper has sex with men for rides to her strip shows…Nasty!
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?